| Economics | Socium | Environment |
|---|---|---|
Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, 2020, 8(27): 95-102
UDC 332 : 502.11 : 479.22
JEL CLASSIFICATION: Q2, Q3, R1
DOI: 10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/13
Givi Talakvadze
PhD in physics and mathematics sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-6032
Zurab Lomsadze
PhD in Technical sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-0759
Joseph Archvadze
PhD in Economic sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-288X
PRIORITIES AND RESOURCES OF GEORGIA: MYTHS, HISTORY, PERSPECTIVES
Abstract: The article deals with issues related to the study of the main socio-economic priorities of Georgia. The brief historical review refutes the widely circulated thesis that during the Soviet period the Georgian Republic allegedly consumed much more goods than it produced; that per capita incomes were calculated astronomically. The issues of the current state of the country's resource supply were also considered. The concept of integral resources is used and it is proposed to combine a number of traditional and newly formed group of potential opportunities over the past decades into a single category of the so-called. "Partial resources", which, along with traditional types - natural, human and material resources, allow the most complete and comprehensive characterization of the possibility of their use for solving urgent socio-economic problems of the country. Particular attention is paid to the current state of Georgia's natural resources on the example of a brief analysis of mineral resources with an emphasis, in particular, on the resources of building and facing materials.
In order to improve the efficiency of managing economic processes, it is proposed to radically improve the activities of ministries and departments of the country by switching to the so-called "Project management system" of the entire economic and economic complex of Georgia. The main feature of this system is associated with the introduction of a three-level classification of the main projects, which will be assigned National, Sectoral and Regional levels, depending on their scale and characteristic features. This will allow developing specific programs for the rational use of natural resources, to optimize the management system at all levels of authorities, to introduce innovative models of sustainable management, intended to significantly improve the living standards of the population of Georgia.
Key words: socio-economic development priorities, integral resources, partial resources, management optimization, national, departmental, regional projects.
Language version: Russian
References
1. Grigor'yev, M., Pavlyushina, V. A., Kulayeva, N. M.-A., & Muzychenko, Ye. E. (2019). Ekonomika Gruzii: khrupkaya ustoychivost' rosta [Georgia's economy: fragile growth sustainability]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 10, 64-84 doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-64-84 [in Russian].
2. Talakvadze, G. (2020). 30 let-Na poroge chetvertogo desyatiletiya vosstanovleniya gosudarstvennoy nezavisimosti Gruzii [On the threshold of the fourth decade of restoration of the state independence of Georgia]. Tbilisi: NEKERI [in Georgian].
3. Tvalchrelidze, A.G. (2006). Poleznyye iskopayemyye i mineral'naya resursnaya baza Gruzii [Minerals and Mineral Resource Base of Georgia]. Moskva: Rudy i metally [in Russian].
4. Talakvadze, G. (2020) Pandemiya Covid-19 – uroki i vyzovy [Covid-19 Pandemic – Lessons and Challenges]. Trudy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy ekonomicheskoy konferentsii – IEC-2020 (21-23 oktyabrya 2020 goda) – Proceedings of the VIII International Economic conferences - IEC-2020 (October 21-23, 2020). State Technical University of Georgia [in Russian].
Article publication date: 2020
Date of online version: 2020
UDC 332 : 502.11 : 479.22
JEL CLASSIFICATION: Q2, Q3, R1
DOI: 10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/13
Givi Talakvadze
PhD in physics and mathematics sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-6032
Zurab Lomsadze
PhD in Technical sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-0759
Joseph Archvadze
PhD in Economic sciences,
Center Studying Productive Forces and Natural Resources of Georgia of the GTU
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-288X
PRIORITIES AND RESOURCES OF GEORGIA: MYTHS, HISTORY, PERSPECTIVES
Abstract: The article deals with issues related to the study of the main socio-economic priorities of Georgia. The brief historical review refutes the widely circulated thesis that during the Soviet period the Georgian Republic allegedly consumed much more goods than it produced; that per capita incomes were calculated astronomically. The issues of the current state of the country's resource supply were also considered. The concept of integral resources is used and it is proposed to combine a number of traditional and newly formed group of potential opportunities over the past decades into a single category of the so-called. "Partial resources", which, along with traditional types - natural, human and material resources, allow the most complete and comprehensive characterization of the possibility of their use for solving urgent socio-economic problems of the country. Particular attention is paid to the current state of Georgia's natural resources on the example of a brief analysis of mineral resources with an emphasis, in particular, on the resources of building and facing materials.
In order to improve the efficiency of managing economic processes, it is proposed to radically improve the activities of ministries and departments of the country by switching to the so-called "Project management system" of the entire economic and economic complex of Georgia. The main feature of this system is associated with the introduction of a three-level classification of the main projects, which will be assigned National, Sectoral and Regional levels, depending on their scale and characteristic features. This will allow developing specific programs for the rational use of natural resources, to optimize the management system at all levels of authorities, to introduce innovative models of sustainable management, intended to significantly improve the living standards of the population of Georgia.
Key words: socio-economic development priorities, integral resources, partial resources, management optimization, national, departmental, regional projects.
Language version: Russian
References
1. Grigor'yev, M., Pavlyushina, V. A., Kulayeva, N. M.-A., & Muzychenko, Ye. E. (2019). Ekonomika Gruzii: khrupkaya ustoychivost' rosta [Georgia's economy: fragile growth sustainability]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 10, 64-84 doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-64-84 [in Russian].
2. Talakvadze, G. (2020). 30 let-Na poroge chetvertogo desyatiletiya vosstanovleniya gosudarstvennoy nezavisimosti Gruzii [On the threshold of the fourth decade of restoration of the state independence of Georgia]. Tbilisi: NEKERI [in Georgian].
3. Tvalchrelidze, A.G. (2006). Poleznyye iskopayemyye i mineral'naya resursnaya baza Gruzii [Minerals and Mineral Resource Base of Georgia]. Moskva: Rudy i metally [in Russian].
4. Talakvadze, G. (2020) Pandemiya Covid-19 – uroki i vyzovy [Covid-19 Pandemic – Lessons and Challenges]. Trudy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy ekonomicheskoy konferentsii – IEC-2020 (21-23 oktyabrya 2020 goda) – Proceedings of the VIII International Economic conferences - IEC-2020 (October 21-23, 2020). State Technical University of Georgia [in Russian].
Article publication date: 2020
Date of online version: 2020